1. Case Overview
The client suffered financial damage caused by another party and found themselves in an unjust situation where they needed to recover their money. However, due to the complex interests of the opposing parties, it was legally demanding to specify exactly who bore the direct responsibility for restitution. Suing the wrong party risked losing the case and wasting time and money. Thus, the client sought Law Firm Theo for definitive relief of their rights.
 

 

• Strategic Designation of Defendants: To prevent the risk of the court finding a single defendant unaccountable, the individual most strongly suspected of taking the unjust enrichment was designated as the "Primary Defendant," while the individual who might have joint or alternative liability was designated as the "Alternative Defendant" in a combined lawsuit.
• Thorough Financial Claim: The claim included not only the entire principal amount of the client's damage but also the statutory delay damages (interest) caused by the litigation delay, aiming to perfectly preserve the client's financial loss.

 

• Complete Victory Against Primary Defendant: The court ruled completely in favor of the client against the primary defendant, ordering them to "pay the plaintiff the entire claimed amount and delayed interest calculated at a rate of 12% per annum until the day it is fully repaid."
• Prompt Damage Recovery: The firm also secured an order stating "provisional execution is permitted," establishing a strong foothold to swiftly proceed with compulsory execution against the opponent's assets to recover the money even before the judgment was finalized. This is a meaningful case where the desired outcome was achieved 100% through Law Firm Theo's strategic litigation (utilizing primary/alternative claims) in a situation that would have been daunting for the client to face alone.