Investment or Loan? Successfully Defended an Unjust Loan Repayment Claim Without a Loan Agreement
26-07-28 159
본문
1. Case Overview
The client received funds from an acquaintance (the plaintiff) under the premise of a joint venture. However, as the business faced difficulties, the plaintiff suddenly filed a lawsuit for loan repayment, claiming the funds were a "loan" rather than an investment. The client had never signed a loan agreement, yet faced the crisis of becoming a massive debtor based solely on bank transfer records.
The core issue of this case was whether the delivered funds constituted a loan or an investment. The plaintiff argued it was a loan using bank transfer records as evidence. In the absence of a disposal document such as a loan agreement, the nature of the funds had to be proven through objective circumstantial evidence.
The attorneys at Law Firm Theo thoroughly analyzed years of message histories between the plaintiff and the client, joint venture meeting materials, and discussions regarding profit sharing to strongly argue that the funds were "investment funds" with no guaranteed return of principal.
4. Result of Assistance
The court fully accepted the arguments of Law Firm Theo, rejected the plaintiff's claim that the delivered funds were a loan, and issued a ruling that completely dismissed the plaintiff's claim. As a result, the client was completely freed from the unjust debt.
________________________
