1. Case Overview
This case involved filing an enforcement order against a former spouse who failed to fulfill child support obligations established at the time of a divorce by mutual consent. The dispute arose after the counterparty stopped paying child support for an extended period.

2. Key Issues

The counterparty claimed there was a prior agreement to reduce child support due to a decrease in income. They further argued that certain expenses spent on the child should be deducted from the overdue amount. However, these were unilateral claims with no evidence of a clear, mutual agreement.

3. Legal Strategy and Assistance

Law Firm Theo systematically countered these claims through objective evidence and formal briefs, focusing on two main points:

• Proving that no agreement to reduce child support ever existed.

• Demonstrating that the claimed expense deductions were legally baseless. By utilizing communication logs between the parties, we successfully refuted the counterparty’s arguments and emphasized the validity and necessity of enforcing the original agreement.

4. Case Result

The court rejected the counterparty’s claims regarding both the reduction agreement and the expense deductions. An enforcement order was issued, commanding the payment of the unpaid child support in installments over a set period. This allowed the client to restore their rights through actual financial recovery, effectively blocking the counterparty's attempts to evade payment and securing a stable environment for the child.