1. Case Overview
The client, a high-ranking public official, was investigated for allegedly directing subordinates to draft documents containing internal information and leaking them externally. The prosecution indicted the client on six severe charges: Abuse of Authority, Violation of the Personal Information Protection Act, Leak of Official Secrets, Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, Violation of the Public Records Management Act, and Theft. Facing numerous serious charges, the client was in the greatest crisis of their public career.
 

 

• Pointing out Illegality in the Search and Seizure: Argued the Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence, proving the investigative agency failed to follow due process, thereby impeaching the prosecution's key evidence.
• Refuting Factual Errors in the Prosecution's Claims: Cross-verified objective circumstances and statements to logically prove errors in the prosecution's narrative, emphasizing the client's directions were within normal professional scope.
• Claiming Fragmentation of Crime Establishment via Legal Analysis: Demonstrated that even if certain facts were admitted, the actions did not meet the legal requirements for Abuse of Authority or Leak of Official Secrets based on precedents.

3. Result of Assistance
The court accepted Law Firm Theo's logical defense in its entirety. The court ruled that due to the illegality of the search and seizure process and the insufficiency of the prosecution's evidence, the client was found Not Guilty on all six charges, allowing the client to clear their name and return to their normal life and position.

__________________________