Defense Against Unreasonable Deposit Deductions: Full Victory in Lease Security Deposit Return Case
26-06-22 97
본문
1. Case Overview
After the lease agreement was lawfully terminated, the client handed over the property to the landlord without any issues. However, the landlord suddenly claimed that additional restoration costs had been incurred and refused to return a portion of the security deposit. Feeling wronged, the client sought the assistance of Law Firm Theo to recover the remaining rightful deposit.
Disputes where landlords attempt to deduct from the security deposit citing "restoration" upon contract termination are highly frequent in practice. The crucial legal issue here is determining "who bears the burden of proof regarding the occurrence of additional damages and the necessity of restoration." In this case as well, the exact scope of restoration and the burden of proof for the incurred costs were the primary focal points.
The dedicated legal team at Law Firm Theo immediately commenced collecting objective evidence and structuring the legal arguments:
- Proof of Tenant's Obligation Fulfillment: Provided clear documentation proving that the client had already faithfully fulfilled standard restoration obligations, such as move-in cleaning and necessary repairs, as requested by the landlord.
- Shifting and Refuting the Burden of Proof: Strongly argued that the burden of proof regarding the necessity of additional restoration and the occurrence of those costs lies entirely with the "landlord."
- Impeaching the Opposing Party's Evidence: Logically and persuasively explained to the court that the meager evidence submitted by the landlord was insufficient to justify the deducted amount.
4. Result of Assistance
The court fully accepted Law Firm Theo's arguments. It ruled that the landlord must pay the client not only the entire unreturned security deposit that was unreasonably deducted but also the delay damages accrued. Furthermore, a complete victory (full acceptance) was achieved, ordering the defeated landlord to bear the entirety of the litigation costs incurred due to this lawsuit. The client was finally able to reclaim their legitimate rights and safely recover the unjustly withheld security deposit.
--------------------
